Ministerial decision about Grainville Cottage (FOI)Ministerial decision about Grainville Cottage (FOI)
Produced by the Freedom of Information officeAuthored by Government of Jersey and published on
07 December 2020.Prepared internally, no external costs.
Request
I would like to request to see any reports accompanying the ministerial decision MD-PH-2013-0034 detailing financial implications.
Response
The report relating to ministerial decision MD-PH-2013-0034 is exempt from publication under clause 3.2.1 (a)(i) of the Code of Practice on Access to Official Information.
The code has since been replaced by the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011 and the information you have requested is exempt under Article 25 (Personal Information).
This document does not contain any financial implications as the rental agreed was slightly higher than that shown in a fair rental assessment of similar properties that was carried out by the housing department at the time.
It was also agreed that periodical rental reviews would be carried out.
Exemption(s) applied
3.2.1 Information shall be exempt from disclosure, if –
(a) such disclosure would, or might be liable to –
(i) constitute an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of an individual;
Article 25 - Personal information
(1) Information is absolutely exempt information if it constitutes personal data of which the applicant is the data subject as defined in the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005.
(2) Information is absolutely exempt information if –
(a) it constitutes personal data of which the applicant is not the data subject as defined in the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018[7]; and
(b) its supply to a member of the public would contravene any of the data protection principles, as defined in that Law.[8]
(3) In determining for the purposes of this Article whether the lawfulness principle in Article 8(1)(a) of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018[9] would be contravened by the disclosure of information, paragraph 5(1) of Schedule 2 to that Law (legitimate interests) is to be read as if sub-paragraph (b) (which disapplies the provision where the controller is a public authority) were omitted.[10]