Speed Limits: Revised Policy (P.167/2010 Amd.) Comments of the Minister for Transport and Technical Services

Information about the publication of Ministerial Decisions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision
providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 1 April 2011:

Decision Reference: MD-T-2011-0032
Decision Summary Title :	Comments on ‘Speed Limits: Revised Policy (P167/2010) – Amendment’		Date of Decision Summary:	29 March 2011
Decision Summary Author:	Manager – Transport Policy		Decision Summary: Public or Exempt? (State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)	Public
Type of Report: Oral or Written?	Oral		Person Giving Oral Report:	Manager – Transport Policy
Written Report Title :	N/A		Date of Written Report:	N/A
Written Report Author:	N/A		Written Report : Public or Exempt? (State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)	N/A
Subject: ‘Speed Limits: Revised Policy (P.167/2010) – Amendment’: Comments of the Minister for Transport and Technical Services.
Decision(s): The Minister approved the draft comments on ‘Speed Limits: Revised Policy (P167/2010) – Amendment’ as attached and instructed the Chief Officer to arrange for the comments to be presented to the States for consideration during the debate on 05 April 2011.
Reason(s) for Decision: To enable the comments of the Minister for Transport and Technical Services on P.167/2010 Amd. to be presented to the States.
Resource Implications: Officer time at TTS and the Greffe for the preparation and presentation of comments.
Action required: Chief Officer to request the Greffier to arrange for the comments to be presented to the States for consideration during the debate on 05 April 2011.
Signature:		Position:
Date Signed:		Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Speed Limits: Revised Policy (P.167/2010 Amd.) Comments of the Minister for Transport and Technical Services

SPEED LIMITS: REVISED POLICY

(P.167/2010) – AMENDMENT

(P.167/2010 Amd.) - COMMENTS

Presented to the States on 01 April 2011 by the Minister for Transport and Technical Services

COMMENTS

The Minister for Economic Development has proposed an amendment which will retain the current 15 mph speed limit on Green Lanes, rather than increase it to 20 as I propose on the recommendations of the review group.

The Minister alleges that it would result in the loss of the Green lane system and impact adversely on the cycle network, both of which are a valuable asset to Jersey’s tourism offer. I would agree that both are valuable, and being responsible for the Sustainable Transport Policy, would not wish to bring a proposal to the House which had a detrimental effect on them.

In recommending that the limit on our Green Lane system should be increased from 15 to 20 mph the review group were mindful that the Chefs de Police, who have responsibility for policing the lanes, consider 20 mph to be more appropriate, and more enforceable. Increasing the limit to 20 mph will also have the advantage of simplifying the number of differing speed limits we have in our Island.

TTS statistics show that the level of compliance with the 15mph speed limit is extremely poor, with the majority of motorists exceeding the limit and 85th percentile speeds being typically between 25 and 30 mph. The great majority of otherwise law abiding citizens when driving along those roads are therefore law breakers and the pedestrians using them are being given a false sense of security. The honorary police would favour a 20 mph limit which they can enforce rather than a 15 mph limit which if enforced would result in fines for the majority of motorists, most of which are local residents.

Senator Maclean argues that the very low 15 mph limit causes motorists to avoid using Green Lanes altogether and this benefit will be lost if the limit is increased to 20. This argument is only reasonable where there is an alternative route to take. There is an extensive network of Green Lanes across the island and several of the designated roads by necessity are well used by motor vehicles to gain access to properties, because there is no alternative.

The cycle network uses a combination of Green Lanes, by-roads, main roads and cycle tracks, and it is not accepted that increasing the speed limit on Green Lanes from 15 to 20mph, would render the cycle route system unsafe. 20 mph is still a low limit, and it should be noted that the proposed policy will result in the speed limit on many of the cycle route roads being reduced from 40 to 30 through the introduction of the default 30 limit on roads without a white line.

I agree with Senator Maclean that Green Lanes are something to be proud of and I believe that in the fullness of time the system should be reviewed to see how it can be developed and improved. The original concept was that pedestrians should be given priority and the 15 mph speed limit was used as an expedient in the absence of more comprehensive legislation. I would suggest that better legislation, giving pedestrians priority, should be considered and also believe that the method and style of signage requires review and investment. In the meantime I believe it right to respect the view of the honorary police and alter the limit to 20 as they suggest and the majority of the public favour. I will therefore oppose the amendment, but in so doing commit to working with Economic Development and the Parish Authorities to develop legislation to enable the establishment of pedestrian priority on our Green Lanes.