Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Independent Custody Visitor Report 2012

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 9 July 2013:

Decision Reference: MD-HA-2013-0042

Decision Summary Title :

Independent Custody Visitor Report 2012

Date of Decision Summary:

4 July 2013

Decision Summary Author:

 

Executive Officer

Home Affairs

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Independent Custody Visitor Report 2012

Date of Written Report:

May 2013

Written Report Author:

Chairperson

Independent Custody Visitors

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Independent Custody Visitor Report for 2012

Decision(s): The Minister noted the Independent Custody Visitor Report for 2012 and requested that it be presented to the States as a Report.

 

Reason(s) for Decision: The Jersey Independent Custody Visitor Scheme handbook that was prepared by the Home Affairs Department for the Independent Custody Visitors provides that one aspect of the role of the Chairperson is to produce, in conjunction with the Department, an annual report on the work of the Independent Custody Visitors.

 

Resource Implications: Nil

 

Action required: The Executive Officer, Home Affairs, to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for presentation of the Independent Custody Visitor Report to the States as soon as practicable.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Home Affairs

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Independent Custody Visitor Report 2012

ICV Report Jersey 2012

Independent Custody Visitor Report Jersey 2012

 

 

 

Independent Custody Visits in Jersey

Independent Custody Visiting was established in Jersey as a result of a proposition by the former Deputy of St. Martin; Mr. FJ (Bob) Hill. The ICV scheme started in October 2010 with 6 ICV volunteers (4 women and 2 men) and has slowly gathered momentum since. From June - December 2011, ICVs undertook 11 unannounced visits to the custody suite at Police Headquarters. From January to December 2012, 25 unannounced ICV visits were made to the custody suite at Police Headquarters. In August 2012, an extra 8 volunteers joined the voluntary ICV scheme, being 2 men and 6 women, bringing the total number of ICVs to 14.

 

 

Background to Independent Custody Visiting 

Independent Custody Visitors (ICVs) are members of the local community who volunteer to make unannounced visits, in pairs, to Police Headquarters to check and report on the treatment and wellbeing of detainees. ICVs are recruited by the Home Affairs Department, but are independent of both the Home Affairs Department and the States of Jersey Police. The ICVs are not paid, but may claim reasonable out of pocket expenses, such as mileage, in line with the rate per mile for States’ employees. 

 

 

The volunteers come from various backgrounds and sections of the community but cannot have any other involvement with the Criminal Justice System, for example the police, courts or prison service. This is in order to maintain the integrity of the scheme. ICVs must be impartial and independent in order to make informed judgements in which the community can have confidence

 

 

The ICV scheme has its own Chair-person responsible for co-ordinating the visiting rota and chairing the quarterly meetings held by the ICVs.

The ICVs carry out their role with a view to providing Home Affairs (and in turn the local community) with assurance that anyone held in police custody is treated fairly and with their human rights respected. The scheme provides transparency and confidence that the police are acting in accordance with the legislation covering the treatment of detainees - the Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 (PPCE).

 

 

Initial training for ICVs is provided by a trainer from the national Independent Custody Visitors Association (ICVA). Officers from the Criminal Justice Department of the States of Jersey Police also meet regularly with the Chair-person to advise on developments that custody visitors should be aware of. 

 

 

Visits to the custody suite are shared between all ICVs and are carried out in pairs at any given time over a 24 hour period.  On arrival at the police station ICVs are, wherever possible, given immediate access to the custody area. Members of the custody staff will accompany the ICVs around the custody block and introduce each pair of ICVs to detainees and ask if they would like to speak to them; they also ask the detainee’s permission for the ICVs to view their custody record. The ICVs will record and report their findings on their observations at the time of their visit. This is then distributed to Home Affairs and to the Chief Inspector in charge of custody. Any immediate concerns are also raised at the time of the visit with the custody sergeant and in some instances the Chair-person. Any issues raised during unannounced visits are scrutinised at the quarterly meetings where the team consider any emerging themes and ensure that any necessary follow up action is completed and any identified concerns are addressed.

 


Visiting Statistics

 

The table and charts below give more details of the 25 visits in 2012

 

Number of unannounced visits carried out in 2012 by ICV’s

Number of detainees in custody at the time of unannounced visits

Number of detainees offered a visit

Number of detainees who accepted a visit

Number of detainees who declined a visit

Number of detainees who were unavailable for visiting (due to sleeping, being interviewed etc...)

25

75

47

37

10

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were 5 occasions recorded during 2012 where access to the Custody Suite was not possible within five minutes of the arrival of ICVs at Police Headquarters. This was for a number of reasons, for example where either a shift change was happening or the custody team was dealing with multiple issues which that took priority over ICV visits (i.e. processing detainees) 

 

 

 

Issues reported by custody visitors

 

From conversations with detainees requests were made for the following:

 

  •              Extra blankets
  •              Food or drink
  •              Reasons for their detention to be further explained
  •              Reading material
  •              Reasons for the length of time they had spent in custody
  •              Concerns about medication on release
  •              Temperature of cells to be adjusted where possible

 

All requests from detainees were reported to the custody sergeant and the majority were dealt with at the time.

 

 

Other queries raised by ICVs were in regard to:

 

  •              Hygiene packs
  •              Fire drill procedures
  •              Excessive temperature of the custody office, which creates an uncomfortable working environment for staff
  •              Cleaning procedures
  •              The lack of cell availability at peak times of custody throughput 

 

 

From March 2012 a no smoking policy was enforced in Police Headquarters, in line with the States of Jersey policy, which follows the UK practice and has been in force in police stations for some time. During the 25 visits made by ICVs, only a small minority of detainees have expressed unhappiness with this policy, with the majority accepting it.

 

 

Shortly after this the Custody Suite changed the choice of food available to detainees. On such occasions where detainees are detained for long durations custody staff do make arrangements for more substantial food options.

 

It is acknowledged that the custody suite is located in an old building and as such does not afford detention of detainees in line with Home Office specifications. Despite these difficult working conditions it is apparent that the custody staff work effectively with the facilities they have.

 

Chair-person ICV Scheme

May 2013

 

1

 

Back to top
rating button