Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Shipping (Fees) (Jersey) Order 2013: Amendment: Law drafting instructions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 12 September 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-E-2014-0092

Decision Summary Title :

Shipping Fees

Date of Decision Summary:

5th Sept 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Registrar of Shipping

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

SHIPPING FEES 2015

Date of Written Report:

5th Sept 2014

Written Report Author:

Registrar of Shipping

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Shipping Fees

 

Decision(s):

 

The Minister has asked the Law Draftsman to prepare amendments to the Shipping (Fees) (Jersey) Order 2013

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

Prescribed fees, as authorised by article 193 of the Shipping Law, have not been increased since 2012. A small increase of 2 ½ % is now proposed to prevent income falling behind increased costs.

 

Resource Implications:

There are no new financial, property, ICT or human resources issues arising.

 

Action required:

Following the Ministerial Decision, the Law Draftsman will be requested to prepare the Order.

 

Signature: Senator A.J.H.Maclean

 

 

Position: Minister

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Shipping (Fees) (Jersey) Order 2013: Amendment: Law drafting instructions

SHIPPING FEES 2015

 

 

Report

 

 

Background

 

Under Article 193 of the Shipping (Jersey) Law 2002 the Minister is empowered to charge fees for the issuing of certificates and documents and for doing anything under the Law.

 

The British Registry of Ships in Jersey is expected to function as far as possible on a user-pays basis. The current scale of fees is set out in the Shipping (Fees) (No. 2) (Jersey) Order 2008 as it was amended in 2011 for application from 1 January 2012. This fees have not increased in the last three years.

 

 

The Proposed Increase in Fees

 

The increase authorised by Financial Direction 4.1 as States policy is a maximum of 2½% per annum unless prior Treasury approval is obtained. Given that the fees have not risen for three years this would actually mean applying a 7.7% compounded increase. Instead, and until a further review of fees is undertaken next year, the recommendation is just to apply the basic 2½% across the board rounded up or down to the nearest pound as appropriate.

 

This very modest increase will help to offset rising costs and assist the Shipping Registry to maintain a user-pays approach to business.

 

 

5 September 2015

Back to top
rating button