Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Sustainable Transport Policy - Amendment to Second Amendment (P.104/2010): Ministerial Comment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 29 November 2010 regarding the presentation of a ministerial comment on Sustainable Transport Policy - Amendment to Second Amendment - (P.104/2010)

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2010-0166

Decision Summary Title:

Comments on P104/2010: Sustainable Transport Policy – Second Amendment and Second Amendment - Amendment

Date of Decision Summary:

26 November 2010

Decision Summary Author:

 

Head of Decision Support

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Comments on P104/2010: Sustainable Transport Policy – Second Amendment and Second Amendment - Amendment

Date of Written Report:

26 November 2010

Written Report Author:

Head of Decision Support

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject: Comments on P104/2010: Sustainable Transport Policy – Second Amendment and Second Amendment - Amendment

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the comments on P104/2010: Sustainable Transport Policy – Second Amendment and Second Amendment - Amendment to be presented to the States at the earliest opportunity.

Reason(s) for Decision:

To enable the Minister’s comments on P104/2010: Sustainable Transport Policy – Second Amendment and Second Amendment - Amendment to be presented to the States.

Resource Implications:

Other than those detailed in the comments there are no further financial or manpower implications.

Action required:

Head of Decision Support to forward the comments to the Greffier of the States and request that they be presented to the States at the earliest opportunity and prior to debate of P104/2010 at the sitting commencing 30th November 2010.

Signature:

 

 

Position: Senator P F C Ozouf

Minister for Treasury and Resources

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision:

 

P.104/2010 Sustainable Transport Policy - Amendment to Second Amendment - Comments

Comments on P164/2010: Sustainable Transport Policy – Second Amendment and Second Amendment - Amendment

 

The Minister for Treasury and Resources wishes to bring to the attention of States Members that both the second amendment (by the Connetable of St. Helier) and the amendment to the second amendment (by the Minister for Transport and Technical Services) require the Chief Minister to bring forward an additional £500,000 in future draft Annual Business Plans over and above that currently allocated. Whilst States approval of this amendment (as amended if applicable) and the main proposition (as amended) would bind the Chief Minister to bring forward such a spending proposal, initially in the 2012 Business Plan, this creates two risks:

 

(1) that the States would not approve the additional expenditure proposed. In this case the Minister for Transport and Technical Services would be committed to be delivering elements additional to those proposed in P104 without any additional funding. This could impact on other aspects of that Department’s service delivery.

 

(2) that in putting forward any approved additional expenditure the Chief Minister would need to either:

 

(a) remove £500,000 from another Department’s cash limit for 2012 so as to remain within the overall spending “envelope” proposed in the 2011 Budget: or

 

(b) increase the overall spending “envelope” proposed in the 2011 Budget by £500,000. This would severely compromise the integrity of this Assembly in maintaining spending targets.

 

Should the Assembly approve the amendment (as amended if applicable) the Minister for Treasury and Resources must, in the first instance, indicate that he would expect any additional costs to be absorbed by the Transport and Technical Services Department within currently proposed expenditure limits.

 

Minister for Treasury and Resources

Back to top
rating button