Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill: Extension to Jersey

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 21 June 2013:

Decision Reference: MD-C-2013-0059

Decision Summary Title :

British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Act – extension to Jersey

Date of Decision Summary:

  21st June 2013

Decision Summary Author:

International Relations

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Act – extension to Jersey

Date of Written Report:

  12th June 2013

Written Report Author:

International Relations

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 Public

Subject:    Extension to Jersey of the British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill.

 

Decision(s): 

The Deputy Chief Minister decided –

  • to lodge a Proposition to the States in accordance with Article 31 of the States of Jersey Law, in order that the States may signify their views on the extension to Jersey of the  British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill .

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

The United Kingdom Government intends to amend the British Nationality Act 1981 to ensure compliance with the Armed Forces Covenant, so that British armed forces are not disadvantaged by military service overseas. The 1981 Act extends to the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories. The Act provides the criteria for acquiring or qualifying for British nationality.  It applies to Jersey as if it was part of the United Kingdom.  It is therefore proposed that the provisions of the Bill should extend to Jersey. 

The Customs and Immigration Department and Law Officers have indicated they are content in principle with the proposal. 

Article 31(1) of the States of Jersey Law 2005 states that:

Duty to refer certain matters to the States

(1) Where it is proposed –

(a) that any provision of a draft Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom should apply directly to Jersey; …

the Chief Minister shall lodge the proposal in order that the States may signify their views on it.

Accordingly, it is proposed that the Chief Minister should lodge the attached Proposition so that the States may signify their view on the matter.

Resource Implications:

There will be no manpower, revenue or capital requirements arising.

Action required:

International Relations to inform the Greffier of the States of the Proposition to be lodged for debate as soon as possible.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position: 

 

Deputy Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill: Extension to Jersey

DRAFT  

 

 

 STATES OF JERSEY

British Nationality Act (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill: extension to Jersey

Lodged au Greffe on …..  2013 by the Chief Minister

STATES GREFFE

 

 

 

 

 

PROPOSITION

 

THE STATES are asked to decide, pursuant to Article 31(1)(a) of the States of Jersey Law 2005,  whether they are of the opinion –

 

 that the provisions of the British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill of the United Kingdom Parliament should, when the Act comes into force, extend to Jersey as proposed in the report of the Chief Minister dated 12 June 2013.

 

 

CHIEF MINISTER

 


REPORT

 

Executive Summary

The purpose of this Proposition is to request the States to signify their view regarding extension to Jersey of the British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Armed Forces Exemption) Bill.

The intention of the Bill is to ensure compliance with the Armed Forces Covenant, so that British armed forces are not disadvantaged by military service overseas.

The Bill would amend the British Nationality Act 1981, which already extends to Jersey and to the other Crown Dependencies, as well as the United Kingdom. It is therefore proposed that the provisions of the Bill should extend to Jersey.Iin particular this would enable the Secretary of State to delegate to His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor the ability, in appropriate circumstances, to exercise in Jersey the same discretion for the purposes of naturalisation as may be exercised by the Secretary of State in the United Kingdom. 

 

Background

The British Nationality Act 1981 includes a requirement that anyone who wishes to be naturalised as a British Citizen must be in the UK on the first day of the five year residential qualifying period for naturalisation.  Currently anyone serving overseas in ‘Crown Service’ can apply for naturalisation without meeting the residence requirements. This would cover foreign personnel in the Forces. However, they must be overseas at the time they make their application and must still be in the forces. This therefore does not cover former foreign soldiers who have remained in the UK or those stationed in the UK.

The amendment proposed broadens this existing exemption so it covers those who have since left the forces and those who are in the UK.

The amendment responds to calls from the service welfare organisations (such as the Royal British Legion, Army Families’ Federation and Veterans Aid) to remedy this issue.

The provision will apply retrospectively to those currently serving who have already completed part of their 5 year residency requirement.

 

Advantages

The British Nationality Act 1981 includes a provision for the Secretary of State, in the case of certain of his functions under the Act, relating for example to naturalisation as British citizens, to arrange for those functions to be exercised on his or her behalf  by HE the Lieutenant-Governor of Jersey.

The amendment will enable the naturalisation requirements to be applied in the same way to members or former of the armed forces in Jersey as in the United Kingdom and enable His Excellency if authorised to do so, in appropriate circumstances, to exercise the same discretion for the purposes of naturalisation in Jersey as exercised by the Secretary of State, for example with regard to former HM armed forces personnel who were overseas at the start of the 5 year residency period and may be resident in Jersey.

The measure will benefit a small group of individuals and in certain cases will make a significant difference to them – e.g. it could result in them being able to apply for citizenship some months earlier than would otherwise have been the case.

 

Resource implications

There are no manpower or resource implications for Jersey.

 

Proposal

Article 31(1) of the States of Jersey Law 2005 states that:

Duty to refer certain matters to the States

(1) Where it is proposed –

(a) that any provision of a draft Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom should apply directly to Jersey; …

the Chief Minister shall lodge the proposal in order that the States may signify their views on it.

Accordingly, the States are being asked to signify their views on extension of the Bill to Jersey. 

 

Manpower and resource implications

There will be no additional manpower, revenue or capital requirements arising for Jersey. 

 

 

12 June 2013

 

 


DRAFT CLAUSES

 

 

 

 

L:\International\Chief Ministers Decisions\Draft decisions\British Nationality Act 1981 (HM Forces Exemption) Act - Article 31 SOJL   .doc Page 1 of 5

Back to top
rating button