Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Plemont Holiday Village: Grant to National Trust for Jersey (P107/2014): Ministerial Comment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 26 June 2014:

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2014-0047

Decision Summary Title:

Comments on P107/2014 Plemont Holiday Village: grant to National Trust for Jersey

Date of Decision Summary:

24 June 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Treasurer of the States

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Comments on P107/2014 Plemont Holiday Village: grant to National Trust for Jersey

Date of Written Report:

24 June 2014

Written Report Author:

Treasurer of the States

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject: 

Comments on P107/2014 Plemont Holiday Village: grant to National Trust for Jersey.

Decision(s): 

The Minister approved his comments on P107/2014 Plemont Holiday Village: grant to National Trust for Jersey.

Reason(s) for Decision: 

To enable the Minister’s comments on P107/2014 Plemont Holiday Village: grant to National Trust for Jersey to be presented to the States.

Resource Implications: 

None.

Action required: 

Greffier of the States to be requested to present attached comments to the States at the earliest opportunity.

Signature:

 

 

 

Position: Senator P F C Ozouf

Minister for Treasury and Resources

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision:

 

Plemont Holiday Village: Grant to National Trust for Jersey (P107/2014): Ministerial Comment

Comments on P.107/2014 Plémont Holiday Village: grant to National Trust for Jersey

 

This proposition requests the Minister for Treasury and Resources to identify the appropriate means of funding for the States, should they wish to do so, to provide a grant to the National Trust for Jersey in order for them to acquire the Plémont Holiday Village site.

 

The Minister for Treasury and Resources considers the potential purchase to be exceptional and one-off occurrence and that it should not be seen as a precedent for approving additional expenditure outside of the now well-established Medium Term Financial Plan and Budget processes. In making this consideration the Minister has taken into account (a) the fact that the National Trust for Jersey is putting forward matched funding for the potential purchase and (b) that this is a one-off opportunity to purchase the land in perpetuity.

 

Potential sources of funding which were considered but are not viable are listed below:

 

Reprioritisation of Capital Programme

 

The 2014 Capital Programme, as approved by the States as part of the 2014 Budget, fully allocated the available spending envelope agreed as part of the Medium Term Financial Plan. There is no scope to vary this in 2014 without significant impact on existing projects.

 

Unspent capital balances from prior year approvals

 

Extensive discussions with departments have not yielded any unspent allocations that could be used for this purpose. Whilst departments will not spend all of the remaining unspent allocations in 2014, in order to commit to a project and progress through tender and contract stages, a project must have sufficient funding to reach completion. Borrowing from existing capital allocations across years is not deemed appropriate as it would pre-empt a future States decision to approve the allocation in a subsequent year.

 

Central Contingency

 

Central Contingency is oversubscribed in 2014 if all current earmarked allocations are required. A grant for the acquisition of Plémont could be funded from within existing resources but only by removing several projects previously supported by the Council of Ministers to be funded from Central Contingency. As well as displacing other projects (which, in turn, would then need alternative funding sources as they are unavoidable) this would also reduce the balance of the Central Contingency to zero, removing any flexibility and conflicting with the key principles of financial management set out in the Medium Term Financial Plan.

 

The Minister will provide States Members with a schedule of Central Contingency funding prior to the debate of P.107/2014.

 

Process to be followed if the States adopt P.107/2014

 

Having taken the above into account and upon advice from the Treasurer of the States, the Minister for Treasury and Resources has identified the process that would need to be followed if the States approves this proposition.

 

Subject to the confirmation of the Attorney General that the requirements of the Proceeds of Crime Law have been met, the Minister can advise that the grant could be facilitated by transferring available funds from the Criminal Offences Confiscation Fund to offset appropriate existing, approved expenditure allocations – in this case the Police Relocation capital head of expenditure. This releases funding to be used to provide the National Trust for Jersey with a grant.

 

The steps would be:

 

(1) funding allocated from the COCF treated as revenue income of the Home Affairs Department (subject to the agreement of the Attorney General);

(2) budget transfer under delegated powers from the Home Affairs revenue to the Police Relocation capital head of expenditure;

(3) budget transfer under delegated powers from the Police Relocation capital head of expenditure to the Chief Ministers’ Department revenue head of expenditure; and

(4) grant from the Chief Ministers’ Department revenue head of expenditure to the National Trust for Jersey. (NB under States spending ruled a grant must be made from a Department – it cannot be made directly from the States as a body).

 

The net effect of these steps is that States expenditure for 2014 would not be increased. The balance of the COCF would decrease by £3.575 million.

 

 

 

Minister for Treasury and Resources

 

Back to top
rating button