Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Community Provisions (Implementation of the Mandate International Criminal Tribunal former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 200-.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (16/01/2009) regarding: Community Provisions (Implementation of the Mandate International Criminal Tribunal former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 200-.

Decision Reference:   MD-C-2009-0005  

Decision Summary Title :

Sanctions - ICTY Update 2009.01.13

Date of Decision Summary:

13.01.2009

Int. 25/6/2

Decision Summary Author:

International Relations

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Draft Order

Person Giving

Oral Report:

International Relations

Written Report

Title :

Community Provisions (Implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 2009

Date of Written Report:

7.1.2009 

Written Report Author:

Law Draftsman

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:  Community Provisions (Implementation of the Mandate International Criminal Tribunal former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 200-

Decision(s): 

The Chief Minister, in pursuance of Article 2 of the European Communities Legislation (Implementation) (Jersey) Law 1996 and having regard to Council Regulation (EC) no. 1763/2004, as amended to 17 September 2008, has decided to make the Community Provisions (Implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 2009 .

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Community Provisions (Implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia) (Jersey) Order 2007 was introduced in Jersey to effect a freeze on the funds and economic resources belonging to, or owned or held by, natural persons indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. 

The measure was equivalent to that of the international community, in particular Council Regulation (EC) No.1763/2007 of 11 October 2004. Subsequently, the EC made changes to the original measure listing those indicted individual who remained at large.  

This Order updates the list of persons connected with the former Yugoslavia whose funds are required to be frozen, by removing certain persons from the list.

Resource Implications:

There are no significant manpower or revenue implications arising.

Action required:

The Chief Minister should sign and seal the attached Community Provisions (Implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia) (Amendment) (Jersey) Order 200- .

The Chief Minister’s Department shall –

(1) inform the Assistant Greffier of the States and the States Greffe Publications Editor immediately the Order is made.

(2) deliver the signed and sealed order to the Publications Editor.

Signature: 

Position:  Chief Minister 

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Back to top
rating button