Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Supplementary Planning Guidance: Design Guidance for St. Helier

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 6 August 2012:

Decision Ref:

MD-PE-2012-0086

Subject:

Supplementary Planning Guidance: Design Guidance for St Helier –draft for consultation

Decision Summary Title:

DS - Supplementary Planning Guidance: Design Guidance for St Helier – draft for consultation

DS Author:

Principal Planner

DS Date:

02 August 2012

DS Status:

Public

Written Report Title:

SD - Supplementary Planning Guidance: Design Guidance for St Helier – draft for consultation

WR Author:

Principal Planner

WR Date

02 August 2012

WR Status:

Public

Oral Rapporteur:

Director

Decision(s):

Further to his earlier decision (MD-PE-2011-0099) the Minister for the Environment noted and endorsed the draft supplementary planning guidance: Design Guidance for St Helier as a basis for public consultation and authorised its release.

Reason(s) for Decision:

  1. The design guidance provides a basis for a targeted and effective assessment of the design aspects of planning applications and future development. Their purpose is to maintain and enhance the quality and character of the built environment of each distinct area of St Helier.
  2. To provide an opportunity for key stakeholders and interested parties to influence supplementary planning guidance

Legal and Resource Implications:

  1. Article 6 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002, provides the Minister with power to issue guidelines and policies (i.e. including supplementary planning guidance). Before doing so, the Minister must consult any other Minister or statutory authority with an interest in the development in question.
  2. The development and publication of planning practice notes are in accordance with the above powers. Also, the main purpose of releasing the draft advice note is to enable formal consultation, prior to review and adoption. It is not envisaged, therefore, that there will be any legal implications associated with the recommended decision.

Action required:

  1. Notify the Chairman of the Environment Scrutiny Panel and other key stakeholders of the Minister’s decision and provide them with a copy of the draft SPG;
  2. Request that the Greffier of the States arrange for a report to be presented in the States for information;
  3. Publish the draft practice note on the States’ website and invite public comment;
  4. Prepare and issue a media release;
  5. Upon completion of the consultation process, inform the Minister for Planning and Environment of the consultation findings, modify the draft supplementary planning guidance, as appropriate, and present to the Minister for adoption

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Deputy RC Duhamel
Minister for Planning and Environment

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different to Date Signed):

 

Supplementary Planning Guidance: Design Guidance for St. Helier

Department of the Environment

Consultation paper

 

 

 

Purpose and type of consultation   

The Consultation Paper sets out the Minister for Planning and Environment’s proposals to introduce design guidance for St Helier. This guidance is intended to assist in the development and assessment of proposals for new development in St Helier and to provide clarity in the assessment of development proposals for tall buildings.

The Minister wishes to secure the views and comment of people who are interested in and affected by the design guidance.

 

Closing date: 21 September 2012

 

 

Summary

This guidance deals with the ways in which the character of St Helier can be maintained and enhanced through the process of development control. It consists of three parts:

  1. overarching design principles that should be considered during the design and development control phases when development change is proposed;
  2. a set of guidelines – character area design guidance – for each of the defined character areas for St. Helier;
  3. guidance about how the Island Plan policy for tall buildings (Policy BE5) is to be interpreted and applied.

Taken together these provide a basis for a targeted and effective assessment of the design aspects of planning applications and future development. Their purpose is to maintain and enhance the quality and character of the built environment of each distinct area of St Helier and the town as a whole

 

Further information

The consultation can be viewed online at: http://consult.gov.je/portal/he/hpr.

 

Printed copies are available from the Department of the Environment, South Hill, St Helier.

 

Please send your comments to:

Richard Williamson, Principal Planner

Planning and Building Services, South Hill, St Helier, JE2 4US

 

How to contact us

Telephone  448456

Email  r.williamson@gov.je

Fax   445528

This consultation paper has been sent to the following individuals / organisations:

Environment Scrutiny Panel

Cultural Development Officer, Department of Education Sport and Culture

Jersey Architecture Commission

Waterfront Design Group

Association of Jersey Architects

Public Consultation Register

Parish of St Helier Roads Committee

Jersey Heritage

Société Jersiaise

National Trust for Jersey

Save Jersey’s Heritage

Council for the Protection of Jersey’s Heritage

Chamber of Commerce

Jersey Construction Council

 

Supporting documents attached

Draft St Helier Design Guidance

Consultation response

To enable responses to be made a series of questions on the proposed changes are set out below. Please feel free to respond to these. You may do this online at http://consult.gov.je/portal/he/hpr or you can detach and submit the questionnaire to the address below.

 

Name:

Organisation:

Address:

Tel:

Email:

 

1. There is a need for design guidance for St Helier?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

2. The draft design guidance, based on the work of the St Helier Urban Character Appraisal, will be a helpful tool?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

3. The form of the design guidance is clear and easy to understand and use?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

4. The definition of the character areas for St Helier accurately reflects the differences between areas of the town?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

5. The objectives for each character area are appropriate and worthy of support?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

6. The specific criteria for each character area are appropriate and worthy of support?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

7. There is a need for more detailed design guidance for Esplanade?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

8. The definition of the character areas for Esplanade (7.a. - 7.d.) is appropriate?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

9. The objectives for each Esplanade character area (7.a. - 7.d.) are appropriate and worthy of support?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

10. The specific criteria for each Esplanade character area (7.a. - 7.d.) are appropriate and worthy of support?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 


11. The Minister’s visual guidance for each Esplanade character area (7.a. - 7.d. see pp. 67-68) is appropriate and helpful?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

12. The interpretation of Policy BE5: Tall buildings is clear and helpful?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

13. Character areas provide a useful and appropriate definition of an ‘immediate vicinity’ for the assessment of proposals for tall buildings?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

14. Tall buildings in St Helier, which are higher than others within the same character area, might be appropriate and acceptable, where they satisfy the criteria set out in Policy BE5 (1.-5.)?

Strongly agree

Agree

Don’t know

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Please give reasons for your answer

 

 

 

Please note that consultation responses may be made public (sent to other interested parties on request, sent to the Scrutiny Office, quoted in a published report, reported in the media, published on www.gov.je, listed on a consultation summary etc). If you have a particular wish for confidentiality please indicate this clearly when submitting a response.

 

I agree that my comments may be made public and attributed to me    

I agree that my comments may be made public but not attributed (i.e. anonymous) 

I don’t want my comments made public        

 

If you agree to your comments being attributed, please provide your details below:

 

Name:

Organisation:

Address:

Tel:

Email:

 


Other comments can be submitted in writing or by email to the address below.

 

Policy and Projects Section

Department of the Environment

South Hill,

St Helier,

JE2 4US

 

r.williamson@gov.je

 

If you or your organisation would like to discuss these proposals further or would like further information, please contact Richard Williamson, Principal Planner on 448456 or r.williamson@gov.je.

 

Deadline for consultation responses: 21 September 2012.

 

Back to top
rating button