REPORT
The Proposition reflects the circumstances that have required a new Law. The proposal is both necessary, to address current uses that are not in accordance with the existing Law, and pragmatic, to avoid burdening the Assembly with decisions on land use that have been agreed with the duly appointed Trustees.
The updated Law also addresses two parcels of land that were omitted from the existing Law and remain subject to the Covenant, when this was not the intended situation.
I remain of the view that the Law, as drafted, properly addresses these issues and that the amendment is unnecessary.
However, rather than seek to defeat the amendment, I have taken the view that it can be accommodated subject to two further amendments that are wholly in line with Deputy Le Fondre’s position, as set out in the report to his amendment.
Firstly, that reference to the States is limited to changes of use that exceed £50,000 a year. The Deputy recognises that ‘It is very difficult to define (under Law) what is a ‘significant’ item…’. In this we are in agreement. This further amendment sets a single, clear and unambiguous threshold to create the clarity he seeks. Both the Trustees and Deputy le Fondré are in agreement with this amendment.
Secondly, the period for the lodging of a proposition by States Members following notification of a change of use that exceeds £50,000 is to be amended to 15 working days.
This period is consistent with the requirements of States Standing Order 168, which has operated for a number of years without disenfranchising any members from raising concerns or lodging a proposition.
The proposed period of ‘…no later than the third meeting of the States following the presentation of the report…’ is an indeterminate period that could be many months, particularly if it fell over the summer recess. It is simply not practical for the Trustees and the Public to engage with third party organisation and reach an agreement in principle, but then wait months before it can be actioned.
It is worth noting that any leases (or disposals for that matter), irrespective of value, would be required to be reported to the States in accordance with the terms of Standing Order 168.
In making these further amendments, I have endeavoured to comply fully with the penultimate paragraph of the Deputy’s report and I hope Members will consider it both proportionate and appropriate.
Financial and Manpower Implications
The financial and manpower implications are minimal and can be absorbed within existing budgets.