Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence Law: Proposed Revision of Codes of Practice

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 21 January 2011 regarding the proposed revision of Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Codes of Pratice) (Jersey) Order 2004

Decision Reference: MD-HA-2011-0006

Decision Summary Title :

Revision of PPCE Code E and the introduction of new PPCE Code of Practice

Date of Decision Summary:

18 January 2011

Decision Summary Author:

 

Executive Officer, Home Affairs

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Revision of PPCE (Codes of Practice) (Jersey) Order 2004

Date of Written Report:

18 January 2011

Written Report Author:

Staff Officer to DCO

States of Jersey Police

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Revision of Codes of Practice – Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence Law.

Decision(s): The Minister approved the law drafting instructions to revise Code E of PPCE, and to introduce a new PPCE code of practice on visual recording with sound of interviews with suspects.

 

Reason(s) for Decision: The existing PPCE (Codes of Practice) (Jersey) Order 2004 refers to the tape recording of interviews with suspects. The States of Jersey Police and the Customs and Immigration Department wish to upgrade their facilities for the interviewing of suspects due to the technological obsolescence of current media. New equipment will utilise digital technology. In order to comply with the Law, new codes will require drafting to enable interviewing of suspects, whether by way of removable media or digital secure network.

 

Resource Implications: There are no additional resource implications to the Home Affairs Department associated with this decision. 

 

Action required: The Executive Officer, Home Affairs to liaise with the Law Draftsman’s office and arrange for the amendments to Code E and the new Code to be drafted.

 

Signature:

 

Position:

Minister for Home Affairs

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence Law: Proposed Revision of Codes of Practice

 

Instructions to the Law Draftsman

 

Revision of PPCE (Codes of practice) (Jersey) Order 2004

 

 

Introduction

 

The Law Draftsman is instructed on behalf of the Minister for Home Affairs by a Ministerial Decision (copy attached) to prepare an amendment to the PPCE (Codes of Practice) Order 2004 in respect of interviewing suspects, whether by way of removable media or digital secure network.

 

General Statement

 

(i)                 Why is an amendment needed?

 

The States of Jersey Police and the Customs and Immigration Department have identified a deficiency in the existing legislation.

 

The existing PPACE (Codes of Practice) (Jersey) Order 2004 refers to the tape recording of interview with suspects. The departments wish to upgrade their facilities for the interviewing of suspects due to the technological obsolescence of current media. This media is becoming obsolete and it is increasingly difficult to source equipment for playback and transcription purposes.

 

 

(ii)               What is the amendment intended to achieve?

 

The amendment to existing legislation is intended to take advantage of modern digital media. Digital recording and storage of electronic media will result in enhances efficiency and reduced cost across a number of areas associated with the criminal justice system.

 

(iii)            How is the amendment to achieve that effect?

 

A revised Order would bring in force amendments to Code of Practice (E) (tape recording of interviews with suspects) and introduce a new Code of Practice (G) visual recording with sound of interviews with suspects) under the Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003, which would enable Police and Customs Officers in Jersey to digitally record interviews with suspects in custody.

 

(iv)  How will the amendment effect existing law and practice?

 

The amendment will not repeal existing legislation but will introduce a new Code of practice (G) under the Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 and make amendments to Code (E) of the Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003.

 

 

 

Detailed Instructions

 

Legislation similar to section Code E and Code F of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Pace) is suggested and therefore it is proposed that an amendment to Code E of Police Powers and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 be made to enable Police and Customs Officers in Jersey to digitally record interviews with suspects in custody an amendments in made to Code E. In addition, the introduction of a new PPCE code of practice (G) on visual

 

 

 

Any questions arising from these instructions should be referred to Sergeant Sarah Henderson, Staff Officer to the Deputy Chief Officer, States of Jersey Police.

 

Back to top
rating button