Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 16 May 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-HA-2014-0037

Decision Summary Title :

Draft States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

14 May 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Executive Officer

Home Affairs

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201- Report

Date of Written Report:

14 May 2014

Written Report Author:

Chief Officer

Home Affairs

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Draft States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201-

 

Decision(s): The Minister approved the draft States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201- and directed that it be lodged ‘au Greffe’.

 

Reason(s) for Decision: The draft Amendment Law enables the Minister to make an Order under Article 13 of the principal Law relating to the standard of performance required of police officers and the evaluation of that performance.  It also makes it clear that the power to charge for police services under Article 24 of the principal Law includes the power to charge for goods and services which are reasonably incidental to normal police activity.

 

Resource Implications: Nil.

 

Action required: The Executive Officer, Home Affairs to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the draft Law to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for consideration by the States on 1 July 2014.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Home Affairs

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201-

States of Jersey Police Force (Amendment) Law 201-

 

Report

 

An Appointed Day Act to bring into force the remaining articles of the States of Jersey Police Force Law 2012 [`the 2012 Law’] from the 1st August 2014 is being lodged concurrently with this amendment.

 

At present, the Discipline Code contained in the Police (Complaints and Discipline Procedure) (Jersey) Order 2000 (`the 2000 Order’) provides that an officer must abide by the provisions of that Order.  Article 2 of the 2000 Order provides that a member of the Force commits an offence against discipline if his or her conduct does not meet the standard set out in the Code.  The 2000 Order then sets out the procedures that must be followed if a member is alleged to have committed a disciplinary offence.

 

Under the 2012 Law it is proposed that police officers may become subject to standards of performance, procedures and measures for dealing with them that do not fall within the structure that is currently in place in the 2000 Order.  Therefore, Article 13(2)(c) of the 2012 Law, as enacted, provides for an Order to be made in relation to the standard of performance required of police officers and how performance is to be evaluated.  However, it is felt that the Order should also provide for how performance that falls below the required standard is to be dealt with and the range of action that may be taken.

 

The draft amendment to Article 24 of the 2012 Law makes it clear that the power to charge for police services includes a power to charge for goods and services which are reasonably incidental to normal police activity.  Such a power is subject to such conditions as the States may set out in Regulations.  Instructions for the Regulations have been submitted for drafting.  These exclude powers in relation to the policing of events and are limited to a power to make a charge or recover costs in relation to such matters as the provision of road accident reports, vehicle examination reports, witness statements and documents of a similar nature, and services such as training and mutual aid.

 

Financial and Manpower Implications

 

There are no financial and manpower implications associated with these amendments.

 

Human Rights

 

The Law Officers’ Department has indicated that the draft Law does not give rise to any human rights issues.

Back to top
rating button