Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Agreement for the Exchange of Information Relating to Tax Matters between Jersey and the Argentine Republic: Ratification

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 9 August 2011:

Decision Reference:  MD-C-2011-0099

Decision Summary Title :

Agreement for the Exchange of Information relating to Tax Matters between the Government of Jersey and the Government of the Argentine Republic

Date of Decision Summary:

5th August 2011

Decision Summary Author:

Project and Research Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Ratification of the Agreement for the Exchange of Information relating to Tax Matters between the Government of Jersey and the Government of the Argentine Republic

Date of Written Report:

28th July 2011

Written Report Author:

Adviser – International Affairs

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject: Ratification of the Agreement for the Exchange of Information relating to Tax Matters between the Government of Jersey and the Government of the Argentine Republic

Decision(s): The Chief Minister agreed to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Report and Proposition inviting the States to ratify the Agreement for the Exchange of Information relating to Tax Matters between the Government of Jersey and the Government of the Argentine Republic.

Reason(s) for Decision: The tax Information Exchange Agreement entered into with the Republic of Argentina is a continuation of the ongoing programme of signing TIEAs or DTAs with all OECD and G20 member countries. The programme is serving to enhance the Island’s international personality and generally is helping to engender a more favourable view of the Island amongst the international community.

The agreement will come into force once the parties to the agreement have ratified it, and any necessary legislative steps have been taken.

Resource Implications: There are no resource implications arising from the ratification of the Taxation Exchange Agreement with the Government of the Argentine Republic.  

Action required: The Greffier of the States is requested to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Tax Information Exchange Agreement between the States of Jersey and the Government of the Argentine Republic at the earliest possible date.

Signature:

 

Position: 

 

Senator T.A. Le Sueur, Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Agreement for the Exchange of Information Relating to Tax Matters between Jersey and the Argentine Republic: Ratification

1st September 2011

 

                Agenda Item:

 

Title of Report: Ratification of the Agreement for the Exchange of Information Relating to Tax Matters between the Government of Jersey and the Government of the Argentine Republic

 

Introduction:

 

The Council of Ministers are asked to agree to present the following report to the States asking them to ratify the signed agreement to be entered into with the Argentine Republic for the exchange of information relating to tax matters.

 

Draft Report:

 

Agreement to be entered into with the Argentine Republic for the exchange of information relating to tax matters.

 

1. The States are asked to ratify the signed Agreement to be entered into with the Argentine Republic for the exchange of information relating to tax matters attached as an appendix to this report.

 

Background:

 

2. In February, 2002 Jersey entered into a political commitment to support the OECD’s tax initiative on transparency and information exchange through the negotiation of tax information exchange agreements to an agreed international standard.

 

3. In September 2009, the Global Forum on Transparency and Information Exchange for Tax Purposes, a body of which more than one hundred jurisdictions are members, agreed a peer review process to assess compliance with the international standard.  To oversee this process, a Peer Review Group was set up chaired by France, with four vice-chairs from India, Japan, Singapore and Jersey.

 

4. Successive G20 Summits have encouraged jurisdictions to make progress in agreeing, implementing and abiding by the necessary international agreements for information exchange.  In response Jersey has maintained an active programme of negotiating agreements with EU, OECD and G20 member jurisdictions.  This has served to enhance the Island’s international personality, and generally has helped to engender a more favourable view of the Island amongst the international community.

 

5. The latest position in respect of the programme of negotiating tax information exchange agreements is attached as an appendix to this report.  A total of 24 tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs) and two double taxation agreements (DTAs) have now been signed, of which fifteen TIEAs and one DTA are in force.  The delay in bringing agreements into force is due to the length of time taken by the other parties to the agreements to complete their domestic procedures for the ratification of the agreements.

 

6. As a Vice-Chair of the Global Forum Peer Review Group, Jersey has been determined to lead by example, and has attached particular importance to entering into agreements on tax information exchange with G20 countries.  Jersey has now signed, initialled or completed negotiation with seventeen of the nineteen G20 countries (the other member of the G20 is the European Union).

 

7. Jersey has been party to the peer review process to assess compliance with international standards, and a report on the assessment of Jersey is due to be published shortly.

 

8. The policy of negotiating TIEAs or DTAs is supported by the finance industry.  The preference of government and the industry is for a DTA but the majority of jurisdictions with whom negotiations have been undertaken have not been prepared to consider a DTA on the grounds that they believe they would derive little if any benefit from such an agreement.

 

 The Agreement with the Argentine Republic

 

9. The Tax Information Exchange Agreement entered into with the Argentine Republic is a continuation of the ongoing programme of signing tax agreements with G20 countries.

 

10. Attached as an appendix to this report is –

 

 (a) the Tax Information Exchange Agreement, which is consistent with agreements signed previously with other countries and which the States have ratified.  The Agreement provides for the exchange of information on tax matters on request;

 

 (b) a letter from the Argentine Minister of the Economy to the Treasury and Resources Minister expressing the commitment to remove Jersey from all relevant Argentine “black lists” once the Agreement is in force and there is strong evidence of its effective application;

 

 Procedure for Signing and Ratifying the TIEA

 

11. The Agreement with the Argentine Republic was signed by the Assistant Chief Minister, UK and International Relations, on the 28th July, 2011 in accordance with the provisions of Article 18(2) of the States of Jersey Law, 2005 and paragraph 1.8.5 of the Strategic Plan 2006-2011 adopted by the States on the 28th June, 2006.  The Council of Ministers authorised the Assistant Chief Minister to sign on behalf of the Government of Jersey.

 

12. The Agreement is now being presented to the States for ratification, following which it will be published and entered into the official record.  The Agreement will come into force once Jersey has notified the Argentine Republic of its ratification.  The ratification procedures for the Argentine Republic were completed with the signing of the Agreement.

 

13. The States, on the 29th January 2008, adopted The Taxation (Exchange of Information with Third Countries (Jersey) Regulations 2008.  The schedule to these Regulations lists the Third Countries, and includes the taxes covered by the agreements being entered into.  As further agreements are entered into, the Regulations are amended to include in the schedule the jurisdiction and the taxes concerned.  The necessary Regulations to provide for the inclusion in the schedule of the Argentine Republic and the relevant taxes will be presented to the States for adoption on due course subsequent to the ratification of the Agreement.

 

 Financial and Manpower Implications

 

14. There are no implications for the financial or manpower resources of the States arising from the ratification and implementation of the Agreement with the Argentine Republic.

 

Recommendation:

 

That the Council of Ministers agree to present the required report and proposition to the States asking them to ratify the signed agreement to be entered into with the Argentine Republic.

 

 

 

 

 

Colin Powell

Adviser – International Affairs

 

 

, 2011

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button