Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Mont Orgueil Castle: First Gate: Emergency Repairs: Use of Ancient Monuments Fund Reserve

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 22 May 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-ESC-2014-0010

Decision Summary Title :

Mont Orgueil Castle repairs

Date of Decision Summary:

12 May, 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Cultural Development Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Mont Orgueil Castle – Emergency Remedial Works

Date of Written Report:

4 February, 2014

Written Report Author:

Cultural Development Officer

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: Emergency repairs to Mont Orgueil Castle

 

 

Decision(s):  The Minister gave consent for the use of £80,000 from the Ancient Monuments Fund Reserve to meet emergency repairs required to the First Gate at Mont Orgueil Castle and agreed to make a formal request for the balance of the funds required, £325,628.59, to the Minister for Treasury and Resources under clause 4.9 of the Usufruct agreement (P218/1996).

 

Reason(s) for Decision:  The Minister noted that the repairs to Mont Orgueil were considered urgent and, therefore, justified the application of the Reserve Fund for which the Minister’s is consent is required. He also noted that the Usufruct agreement prescribed an approach to the States in the event that the cost of repairs to either castle should exceed the total funding available within the Ancient Monuments Fund.

 

Resource Implications:  There are no resource implications.

 

Action required:  This decision and the supporting report will be sent to the Minister for Treasury and Resources. The Minister noted that the Treasury and Resources Department had been notified via Jersey Property Holdings of the matter.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Mont Orgueil Castle: First Gate: Emergency Repairs: Use of Ancient Monuments Fund Reserve

 

Education, Sport and Culture Department

Report

 

Subject:

Mont Orgueil Castle – Emergency remedial works

Exempt Clause:

 

Date:

4 February, 2014

 

 

Author:

Rod McLoughlin, Cultural Development Officer

 

  1. Introduction

 

This report supports a request for emergency funding to undertake repairs at Mont Orgueil Castle under the contract governing management of the two castles (‘the Usufruct agreement’) between the States of Jersey and Jersey Heritage.

 

  1. Background

 

Elizabeth Castle and Mont Orgueil Castle belong to the States of Jersey.  There were administered by the Public Services Department (now TTS) until the late 1990s when the States agreed that Jersey Heritage should run the castles as historic attractions. Funds generated from ticket income would contribute to the running and maintenance costs.

 

Under the Usufruct agreement signed to achieve this, maintenance of Elizabeth Castle and Mont Orgueil Castle is undertaken from a fund (the Ancient Monuments Fund or ‘AMF’) which is fed by 17% of ticket sales from the two castles.  Under the agreement, Jersey Heritage is required to undertake normal repairs to the castles and, in addition, to retain a reserve of £100,000 for unforeseen repairs which can only be used with the consent of the Minister for ESC.

 

However, the agreement also states that in the event of repairs too costly to be undertaken from the AMF, Jersey Heritage may revert to the States for additional assistance.  Clause 4.9. states:

 

“In the event of repairs whether urgent or otherwise being required to the Castles or to either of them which will exceed in cost the whole of the Fund the Trust may apply to Finance and Economics for additional funding”.

 

From the perspective of the States, the arrangement has been very satisfactory: excluding work required as a consequence of the Mont Orgueil refurbishment, Jersey Heritage has maintained the castles using the AMF and has not had to revert to the States.  However, it now faces an urgent repair at Mont Orgueil, the cost of which exceeds the whole of the fund; consequently, it applies to the States for assistance to meet these costs (see project budget at Appendix A). 

 

It is important to recall that the purpose of the Usufruct agreement was to enable the States-owned castles to be made available for the benefit of the public and for a contribution to their maintenance to be generated in the process.  However, the agreement is clear on the ultimate maintenance responsibility which lies with the States.  Clause 4.7 states:

 

“…the Trust shall only be liable to utilise monies derived from the [Ancient Monuments] Fund and shall not be obliged to have recourse to any of its other monies or assets so that the obligations and liabilities of the Trust hereunder shall be limited to the extent to which the Fund from time to time can meet the cost of fulfilling and discharging the liabilities…”

 

Jersey Property Holdings has advised the DfESC that it does not have the funding to support the work and has recommended that an approach be made by the Minister for ESC to the Treasury Minister.

 

  1.    The Mont Orgueil remedial works

 

Jersey Heritage undertakes a regular cycle of inspections of all the properties for which it is responsible.  The condition of the First Gate at Mont Orgueil Castle has been closely monitored over an extended period because of signs of movement in the masonry and adjoining structure. It is possible that the creation of a car park by the Public Services Department when it was responsible for the castle may have exacerbated the condition of the gate.  In any event, it has been monitored since 1997.  In December 2012 Jersey Heritage commissioned a report into its condition and proposals for its repair.

 

The report concluded that “a decision needs to be taken as [to] whether [underpinning] should be carried out, or whether the rate and amount of movement is within acceptable limits.”[1]

 

Specialist inspections commissioned during the course of 2013 revealed a deterioration. In July 2013, responding to the first inspection, Jersey Heritage introduced temporary boarding around the arch of the gate to protect against possible falling masonry. The matter was raised with ESC and Property Holdings in July 2013; on 17 July the Director of Estates confirmed by email that he had made the Treasury aware of a potential ‘claim’ so it could consider how the remedial works could be funded and any other information that might be required.  There was no direct contact on the subject from Jersey Property Holdings as a result but the DfESC forwarded details of the works in December.

 

Remedial works to underpin the gate and repair integral masonry and the surrounding structure is now urgently required.  Antony Gibb states in a letter of 18 December 2013 to Jersey Heritage:

 

“Both the monitoring engineers, Arup, and the structural engineers, Hockley & Dawson, recommend that under-pinning and associated masonry repair is required now.  Certainly the shoring in place under the First Gate arch cannot remain in the long term and would ideally be removed before the castle re-opens next year.”

 

Jersey Heritage has undertaken a tendering process and Woodrow Burton Associates has supplied a project budget of £405,628.59. Works will be undertaken in two phases: first, the underpinning which will be accomplished within four months; and secondly, repointing of masonry which may be undertaken from March onwards, once the underpinning is completed. 

 

Jersey Heritage expects to maintain public access to the Castle, if necessary using only the rear access route for a time.  However, it should be noted that the commercial impact of not completing the work will increase during the summer: current safely measures prevent vehicle access to the Lower Ward and this is likely to impact upon hirings of the Castle which require additional infrastructure (e.g. weddings).

 

 

  1.    Ancient Monuments Fund

 

There is insufficient funding within the AMF to support the remedial works required.   The balance of the main fund (excluding the reserve) is being applied in its entirety to an urgent repair at Elizabeth Castle.  It should be noted that the Minister for ESC has also given permission for a small amount of the reserve fund (£8,811.02) to be applied to complete this repair.[2] The effective balance on the reserve fund taking into account ongoing maintenance is currently calculated to be £80,000.

 

Jersey Heritage has no budgetary allowance for maintenance of this magnitude and it now applies to the States for emergency funding under the terms of the Usufruct. The Minister’s approval is required for use of remaining balance on the reserve fund and, on the assumption that it is applied to the project, it will have the effect of reducing the total required from the Treasury but there is an outstanding balance of £325,628.59.  The DfESC does not have access within its own cash limit and, therefore, must make a formal request to the Minister for Treasury and Resources for additional funding.

 

  1.            Recommendation

 

It is recommended that:

 

(i)     The Minister give his consent to the use of the remaining funds in the AMF reserve (£80,000)  to be applied to the Mont Orgueil repairs on the basis that this is an urgent repair.

 

(ii)   The Minister forwards this report to the Minister for Treasury and Resources and requests that the sum of £325,628.59 is provided to Jersey Heritage to fund the emergency repairs and stabilisation.

 

 


[1] Report ‘Mont Orgueil Castle First Gate and Chemise’ by Antony Gibb Limited, December 2012 p.12

[2] See report of the Cultural Development Officer dated 19 December, 2013.

Back to top
rating button