POLICE COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE ( JERSEY ) LAW 1999
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Background
The Attorney General would like an amendment to the Police Complaints and Discipline (Jersey) Law 1999 to be promoted. The amendment centres on a difficulty with Article 21 of the Law, which concerns complaints about members of the Honorary Police.
Article 21(3) provides that a complaint against a member of the Honorary Police is not suitable for informal resolution unless a complainant gives his consent; and the Attorney General is satisfied that the conduct complained of, even if proved, would not justify a criminal charge or disciplinary hearing.
It follows in Article 21(4) that if it appears to the Connétable, after attempts have been made to resolve a complaint informally, that informal resolution of the complaint is impossible, he shall inform the Attorney General.
Under Article 21(5), if it appears to the Attorney General that a complaint is not suitable for informal resolution, or the Connétable informs him that informal resolution of a complaint is impossible, the Attorney General shall notify the Police Complaints Authority of the complaint; and direct the Connétable to request the Chief Officer, States of Jersey Police, to appoint a member of the Force (or a police officer from some other force, of at least the rank of inspector), to carry out an investigation.
It would seem that the purpose of the investigation above would be to ascertain whether a charge should be laid, and a disciplinary hearing conducted. Yet, in accordance with Article 21(3) no informal resolution should be approved by the Attorney General where the conduct would justify a disciplinary hearing.
It is the view of the Attorney General that this is inconsistent, and requires changing. He feels that it is not sensible to require the States of Jersey Police to use valuable resources in the investigation of matters which are not sufficiently serious as to justify a disciplinary hearing.
Proposed amendment
The proposed amendment would be to remove the requirement in Article 21(5) for the Attorney General to direct the Connétable to request the Chief Officer to carry out an investigation where informal resolution of a complaint is impossible.
However, it is the view of the Attorney General that it would be desirable to retain the provisions whereby a Connétable must notify the Attorney General of the outcome of an attempt at informal resolution. This would provide a monitoring mechanism by which further steps may be taken if appropriate.
There is no requirement to inform the Police Complaints Authority in minor cases of complaints against members of the Honorary Police, and there would therefore seem to be no reason to require the Attorney General to notify the Authority where informal resolution has failed. The reason for this existing provision is that the Authority may wish to supervise the investigation by the States of Jersey Police. If, by amendment, the necessity for there to be an investigation is removed, there is no need for the Authority to be notified.
Recommendation
I recommend that the Minister agrees to promote the amendment as requested by the Attorney General, and requests the Executive Officer to provide law drafting instructions to the Law Draftsman to give effect to the amendment.
Miss K. L. Slack
Executive Officer, Home Affairs
20th December 2005