This is a proposal for a 5 degree pitch timber conservatory extension to the eastern side of the existing block work café, which used to be the public toilets in St Aubin’s car park. The area where the structure is proposed is currently used for the café’s outside seating area. Letter from applicant Ms Roff states, in her letter dated 26th April 2006, that there is an existing flat roofed conservatory which sits below the ridge line of the building, and any ‘unacceptable harm’ has already been caused by the existing approved conservatory. The intention is, ‘quite simply to extend this structure around the east side of the building, in proportion to the current conservatory and block work building’. She goes on to suggest that the conservatory is, ‘approximately 85% glazing, making it difficult to believe it obstructs public views to the foreshore and the sea’. She states that Tourism and Property Holdings subsequent to the refusal have assured her of their backing for the application. Ms Roff goes on to say that no letters of objection were received. Considerable re-development has taken place next door which has, ‘dramatically changed the built landscape and generating considerable controversy’. The increase in covered floor area is, ‘financially vital to ensure that the café can remain open throughout the year and that I may be able to provide continued employment to my core staff’. Comments on letter The proposed conservatory is likely to have a detrimental affect on the character of this modest block work building, furthermore it is proposed in a prominent position and would be clearly seen from public views. Policy BE11 states that. ‘there is a presumption against extensions to existing buildings where such developments will fill gaps or obstruct public views to the foreshore or sea. Particular attention will therefore be paid to the siting, massing and height of any proposed development.’ Policy TR2 states that, ‘there will be support for al fresco activities associated with cafes, subject to their being no unacceptable loss of amenity to neighbouring uses or unacceptable public safety issues.’ Support for facilities will normally be permitted provided that, they (i) will not unreasonably affect the character of the area… (vii) they are appropriate in scale, form, massing, density and design to the site and its context’. Unfortunately, this proposal is considered to result in a scheme whereby the timber structure would wrap around the building, which would disturb the simple nature of the east elevation and is not considered appropriate in this context and would obstruct public views to the foreshore and sea. The fact that the structure is glazed does not mean that the views to the sea will remain. The existing conservatory is positioned to the south side of the café, on the promenade side and does not therefore disturb the simple gable end character of the building, or affect shoreline views. It is clearly an extension which does not wrap around the building. The former Battricks Boatyard site was approved as a replacement building and is considered to reasonably meet the policies set out in the Island Plan, 2002. Presumably Ms Roff took on the concession as a low key hjigh season seaside café, but the fact that this conservatory is likely to bring her more income is not a key planning consideration if on balance the proposal is considered to detrimentally affect the character of the building. The existing conservatory can be used for this all year round. |