POLICE (HONORARY POLICE COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE PROCEDURE) ( JERSEY ) REGULATIONS 2000
POLICE (COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE PROCEDURE) ( JERSEY ) ORDER 2000
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
- Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline Procedure) ( Jersey ) Regulations 2000
Background
The Attorney General would like an amendment to the above Regulations to be promoted. In 2005 a disciplinary hearing in relation to a complaint made against a member of the Honorary Police brought to light a difficulty in respect of the Schedule to the above Regulations, which sets out the Discipline Code.
Paragraph 5 of the Discipline Code states:
“Use of force and abuse of authority
Officers must never knowingly use more force than is reasonable, nor should they abuse their authority.”
The difficulty encountered in the disciplinary hearing centred on the use of the word “knowingly”. This would appear to relate to the use of more force than is reasonable, and would apparently signify that an Honorary Police Officer has not acted in breach of the Discipline Code if, whilst using more force than is reasonable, they are able to show that they did not do so knowingly.
The view of the Attorney General is that in the context of the disciplinary offence of abusing their authority, or using more force than is reasonable, it should not be a defence for an Honorary Police Officer to show that they did not realise that they were using more force than was reasonable.
Proposed amendment
The view of the Attorney General is that the word ‘knowingly’ should be removed from this Part of the Code. It is acknowledged that there will be occasions where an Honorary Police Officer may genuinely misread a situation, and use force, which is subsequently shown to be excessive. However, they will have the defence to a charge in relation to such an offence if they can show that at the time the force that they were using was no more than was appropriate. This would enable them to argue that they had used reasonable force. The Attorney General feels that the question of what is ‘reasonable’ should not depend on the state of knowledge of the Honorary Police Officer, but should, rather, be an objective test.
The proposed amendment would be something akin to:
“Officers must never use more force than is reasonable in all the circumstances, nor should they abuse their authority.”
The Attorney General has discussed this proposed amendment with the Jersey Police Complaints Authority, which is supportive. He has also drawn the proposal to the attention of the Honorary Police Association and the Comité des Connétables. He believes that the Honorary Police Association is supportive, although he has not received a formal response, but has not received any substantive comment from the Comité des Connétables.
- Police (Complaints and Discipline Procedure) ( Jersey ) Order 2000
Background
Schedule 1 to the above Order sets out the Discipline Code for Officers of the States of Jersey Police Force. Paragraph 5 of the Code is identical to that set out above for Honorary Police Officers, namely:
“Use of force and abuse of authority
Officers must never knowingly use more force than is reasonable, nor should they abuse their authority.”
It is a previously accepted position that it is desirable to ensure that the Discipline Codes for both the States of Jersey Police and the Honorary Police are on similar terms. It follows therefrom that if it is felt appropriate to amend the Honorary Police Regulations, it would also be appropriate to amend the States of Jersey Police Order.
Proposed amendment
As detailed above, the Attorney General feels that the term ‘knowingly’ should be removed from this Paragraph of the Code, and feels that paragraph 5 should be amended to read something akin to:
“Officers must never use more force than is reasonable in all the circumstances, nor should they abuse their authority.”
He has consulted with the Deputy Chief Officer, States of Jersey Police, who has, in turn, consulted with the Police Association and other colleagues and their view is that provided that an officer who uses force which is “reasonable in all the circumstances” suffers no prejudice, then they are content for the term ‘knowingly’ to be dispensed with.
The Jersey Police Complaints Authority are also content with the proposed amendment.
Recommendation
I recommend that the Minister agrees to promote the amendments as requested by the Attorney General, and requests the Executive Officer to provide law drafting instructions to the Law Draftsman to give effect to the amendments.
Miss K. L. Slack
Executive Officer, Home Affairs
20th December 2005