Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Road Traffic (No. 62) (Jersey) Regulations 201-: Lodging

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 28 September 2015:

Decision Reference:  MD-T-2015-0080

Decision Summary Title :

Draft Road Traffic (No.62) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

Date of Decision Summary:

23 September 2015

Decision Summary Author:

 

Manager – Transport Policy

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

23 September 2015

Written Report

Title :

Draft Road Traffic (No.62) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

Date of Written Report:

N/A

Written Report Author:

Manager – Transport Policy

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:  Road Traffic (No.62) (Jersey) Regulations 201-.  New offences relating to causing death or serious injury by dangerous or careless driving.

 

Decision(s): The Minister approved the draft Regulations and accompanying report and instructed that they be lodged in the States.

 

Reason(s) for Decision: To provide appropriate penalties in order to deter unsafe road use.

 

Resource Implications: TTS officer time.

 

Action Required: Draft Regulations with report to be lodged au Greffe for subsequent debate by the States.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Transport and Technical Services

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Road Traffic (No. 62) (Jersey) Regulations 201-: Amendment: Law drafting instructions

Road Traffic (No.62) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

Report

 

In 2011 a fatal road crash occurred on St Clement’s Coast Road.  The driver was charged with causing death by dangerous driving, an offence which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment.  The Prosecution concluded however that there was insufficient evidence to secure a conviction for dangerous driving and proceeded with the alternative charge of careless driving for which the maximum penalty is £1,000.  The defendant pleaded guilty to that charge, was fined £750 and disqualified from driving for one year.

 

The previous Minister for Home Affairs subsequently wrote to the previous Minister for Transport and Technical Services requesting that an offence be created in the Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, of causing death by careless driving with a penalty of up to five years imprisonment.   

 

A cross departmental review of traffic penalties concluded that the need for an offence of causing death by careless driving was evident but that the consequence of causing serious injury should also be addressed. 

 

Over 50 serious road injuries per year typically occur in Jersey, whereas on average there are three fatalities.  These injuries though not fatal could be life changing and the seriousness of them should also be recognised in the offences and level of penalties.

 

Proposed new offences have therefore been developed which would combine the seriousness of the action with the seriousness of the consequences and ensure that the Court has the power to apply appropriate penalties in order to provide an effective deterrent to unsafe road use.

 

The penalties for the new offences (where equivalent offences exist) are consistent with the penalties applicable in the UK.  The Attorney General has advised on the appropriateness of all the offences and penalties.

 

A summary of the existing/proposed legislation is provided in the following table:-

 

Offence/

consequence

Dangerous driving

Careless driving whilst under influence of drink or drugs

Careless driving

Causing Death

Existing Article 23.  Fine and up to 10 years’ imprisonment and 2 years’ disqualification.

Existing Article 26.  Fine plus up to 10 years’ prison as existing, increase in disqualification to 2 years (then 3 years for second offence).

 

Proposed new offence, (Article 25A).  Fine plus up to 5 years’ imprisonment, plus 12 months’ disqualification.

Causing Serious Injury

Proposed new offence, (Article 23A). Fine and up to 5 years’ imprisonment and 2 years’ disqualification.

 

Proposed new offence, (Article 26B).  Fine plus up to 4 years’ prison plus 2 years’ disqualification (then 3 years for second offence).  

Proposed new offence, (Article 26A).  Fine plus up to 2 years’ imprisonment plus 12 months’ disqualification.

No injury

Existing Article 22.  Fine and up to 2 years’ imprisonment as existing.  Proposed disqualification for 12 months.

Existing Article 27 (Driving under influence).  12 months disqualification (then 3 years for second offence) as existing.  Proposed increase in fine to Level 4 (£5000) plus up to 12 months’ imprisonment. 

 

Article 25.  Proposed increase from £1000 fine  to Level 4 (£5000).

 

 

Financial and Manpower implications

 

There are no additional financial and manpower implications arising from the proposed regulations.

Back to top
rating button