Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200-: Draft

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (04.09.2009) to approve the draft Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200-.

Please note:  The regulations are actually contained in the Gambling (Gaming and Lotteries) (Amendment No. 15) (Jersey) Regulations 200-.

Decision Reference:   MD-E-2009-0158 

Decision Summary Title :

Lodging Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Date of Decision Summary:

04.09.09

Decision Summary Author:

 

Director of Regulatory Services

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Date of Written Report:

04.09.09

Written Report Author:

Director of Regulatory Services

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Draft Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200-  - lodging.

 

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the draft Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200- and agreed that they be lodged au Greffe for debate at the earliest opportunity.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Minister must formally approve the decision to lodge this draft legislation. The purpose of this Regulation is to increase the fees for gaming machines sited in Licensed Betting Offices, and expand the definition of gaming machines to keep these devices in step with technical advances. The Regulation gives the Minister the right to determine what types of machine should and should not be allowed in this specified premises.

The increases are contained in Part 3 of the Gambling (Gaming and Lotteries) (Jersey) Regulations 1965, as amended and the Minister proposes to increase the machine fee from the current £2,000 to £4,000 in accordance with States 4.1 financial direction and the “user pays” policy.

 

Resource Implications:

There are no manpower implications. Financially, the effect of introducing these regulations will increase revenue to the States by approximately £124,000.

 

Action required:

The Technical & Compliance Manager to forward the Report and draft Regulations to the States Greffe with a request that they be lodged and debated as soon as practicable.

 

Signature:  Senator A.J.H.Maclean

 

 

Position:  Minister

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Gambling (Machine 2010 Fees) (Jersey) Regulations 200-: Draft

 

REPORT GAMBLING (MACHINE 2010 FEES) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 200-

 

 

REPORT

Background

In 2002 a proposition, P 19/2002 was taken to the States to amend the Gambling (Gaming and Lotteries) (Jersey) Regulations 1998 to enable the provision in licensed betting offices of gaming machines. The Regulations introduced a scheme for the licensing of such premises and made provision for the regulation of gaming machines. Amendment No 14 of these Regulations came into force on the 14th March 2002, and since then, both licence fees and conditions governing gaming machines, including stake, prize and manner of play have remained static. This proposition introduces a broader definition which takes into account technical changes in machines and removes those mechanical provisions that anchor the gaming machine to what is swiftly becoming a redundant device.

 

The definition permits machines which differ from reflective or random AWPs in that they are purely software driven terminals. Users may bet on a variety of events the outcome of which is driven by a random number generator which may be operated by an independent third party and located remotely. The terminal accepts a customer’s bet and displays the event and result on-screen in a format that varies in accordance with the type of event chosen.

 

To a minor degree server based gaming is already offered in LBOs in the form of virtual racing events; however bets are transacted over the counter and the event is open to all wishing to gamble on the outcome but the result is still based on a result generated remotely.

 

The amendment mandates the Minister to produce written controls in the form of guidance, codes of practice and technical standards; compliance will be a licence condition and cancellation of the licence understood to be a penalty for failure to comply. The Codes of Practice will detail a limitation on the number of machines, stakes and prizes and, amongst other requirements set pay out percentages, play cycles and play processes.

 

Any terminal or machine offered for play by an operator shall be connected to a monitoring system capable of recording, retaining and replaying information regarding all game play on the machine including all interaction as well as ‘significant events’ such as power failures and so on. This monitoring system shall be fully open and accessible to the Minister and designated officials and the Minister shall have the right to determine the type of monitoring system that operators must install and use.

 

It will be a requirement for random number communication to be independently audited by a third party. All gaming/betting products offered by the gaming machine must be certificated by an approved independent software testing house.  The Minister will approve testing houses / laboratories for this purpose and publish technical standards.

 

Suppliers of these products must be registered with and therefore approved by the Minister. LBOs cannot offer these products from a supplier who is not registered. Suppliers will enter into an undertaking to guarantee compliance with Codes of Practice, technical standards and further guidance. It will be a licence condition that an LBO cannot offer events/games from an unregistered supplier, equally a registered supplier who breaches the terms of the undertaking and regulatory requirements must cease supply.

 

In line with the statement of key licensing principles, operators will adhere to a responsible gambling code and ensure information must be present on all machines including contact information for help providers. The Code will insist warnings of excessive gambling must also be displayed. The machines should also provide help pages accessed by use of icon or button. These pages must be accessible at all times. Responsible gambling and literature from approved help providers must be prominently displayed adjacent to these machines. Promotional material for these terminals may only be internally displayed and the content of which should in no way encourage excessive play.

Licence Fees

The Economic Development Minister proposes to increase gambling licence fees for 2010 onward in line with the “user pays” principles detailed in Financial Direction No 4.1. The increases would apply to all betting offices that have gaming machines as detailed below and reflect the increased regulatory requirement occasioned by the publication of operational principles, technical standards and industry compliance with the same:

 

LICENCES (Unchanged since 14th March 2002)

Type

Current fee

Proposed fee

Gaming Machines

£2,000 per machine per annum

£4,000 per machine per annum

Gaming Machine Type 2 (to be approved by the States in September 2009

Not presently in service

£4,000 per machine per annum

 

The Minister will bring forward legislation after the summer to create a new Gambling Commission and the Commission will be expected to finish the modernisation programme and bring fees fully into line with costs.  The Commission will assess gaming machine fees on an annual period and keep all publications pertinent to gaming machines under constant review. 

Finance and manpower implications.

There are no manpower implications. Financially, the effect of introducing these regulations will increase revenue to the States by approximately £124,000.

 

Back to top
rating button