Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Scrutiny Report - Comprehensive Spending Review 2 (S.R. 13/2011): Response of the Minister for Health and Social Services

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 9 December 2011:

Decision Reference:        MD-HSS-2011-0045

Decision Summary Title :

Ministerial response to the HSSH Scrutiny Panel report on Comprehensive Spending Review 2 S.R.13/2011

Date of Decision Summary:

22 November 2011

Decision Summary Author:

 

Assistant Director Corporate Planning and Performance Management

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Ministerial response to the HSSH Scrutiny Panel report on Comprehensive Spending Review 2 S.R.13/2011

Date of Written Report:

11 November 2011

Written Report Author:

Assistant Director Corporate Planning and Performance Management

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:  S.R.13/2011- Health, Social Security and Housing Scrutiny Panel report on Comprehensive Spending Review 2- Response by the Minister for Health and Social Services.

 

Decision(s):  The Minister made the response to the HSSH panel’s report S.R.13/2011 on the Comprehensive Spending Review (2) in the report entitled - The Minister for Health and Social Services response to the HSSH Scrutiny Panel report on Comprehensive Spending Review 2 S.R.13/2011.

Reason(s) for decision: To formally reply to the HSSH panel’s key findings and recommendations in line with Section 11.15 of the Code of Practice for Scrutiny Panels and the Public Accounts Committee.

Resource Implications: None

 

Action required: Greffier of The States to arrange for report to be presented to States.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Health and Social Services

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button