Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

10 Columbus Street, St. Helier - Request for Reconsideration.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (26/10/2007) regarding: 10 Columbus Street, St. Helier - Request for Reconsideration.

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2007-0275

Decision Summary Title:

10 Columbus Street, St Helier - Request for Reconsideration

Date of Decision Summary:

26 October 2007

Decision Summary Author:

Kelly Johnson

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

10 Columbus Street, St Helier - Request for Reconsideration

Date of Written Report:

12 October 2007

Written Report Author:

Kelly Johnson

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: 10 Columbus Street, St Helier – Request for reconsideration of refusal of planning permission.

Decision(s):

The Minister decided to maintain refusal of the Planning application P/2007/1581

Reason(s) for Decision:  

Having regard to the representations received and all material planning considerations

1. The proposal will unreasonably affect the character and amenity of the area contrary to Policy IC21 of the Island Plan 2002

2. The proposal, by virtue of noise and odour pollution, will unreasonably impact on neighbouring uses contrary to Policy IC21 of the Island Plan 2002.

3. The proposal will lead to unacceptable problems of traffic generation, safety and parking contrary to Policy IC21 of the Island Plan 2002.

Resource Implications: None

Action required: Issue refusal notice and advise all other interested parties.

Signature: 

Position: 

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

26th October 2007

10 Columbus Street, St. Helier - Request for Reconsideration.

Planning and Environment Department

Report for Ministerial Meeting  

Application Number

P/2007/1581

 

Site Address

10 Columbus Street, St. Helier.

 

 

Applicant

Mrs A Du Four

 

 

Description

Change of use of ground floor butchers shop to hot food take-away.

 

 

Type

Planning

 

 

Date Validated

29/06/2007

 

 

Zones

Built-Up Area

Town Map Area

 

 

Policies

G2 –General Development Considerations

IC21 – Take-Away Food Outlets

 

 

 

Summary/

Conclusion

The proposal is for a hot food take-away within a predominately residential area. With the exclusion of the public house opposite the site, there are no other potential sources of late night noise or disturbance within the immediate area.  

Whilst the Island Plan supports active uses to encourage vitality within the St Helier town centre, a balance must be struck between potentially conflicting land uses and the predominance of residential uses in the area.  

Conditions could be imposed to control the nuisance of noise and odour, but the nature of the proposed use would result in increase activity late at night and parking problems, which is an unacceptable impact on the character of the area and on the amenity of the neighbouring properties. 

 

 

Officer

Recommendation

Refuse

 

Site Description

The site is located on the corner of Columbus Street and Albert Street. The shop is located on the ground floor with residential flats above and residential properties surrounding. A public house is situated opposite the subject site to the south-west and a vehicle maintenance garage to the north-east.

 

 

Relevant Planning History

None

 

 

Existing use of Land/Buildings

Butcher

 

 

Proposed use of Land/Buildings

Hot Food Take-away

 

 

Consultations

Parish in their letter dated 10 August 2007 requested the Committee to note that whilst a hot food take-away will provide a valuable facility, it will result in late night noise and parking problems.  

In their letter dated 6 September 2007 the Parish state they do not support the application because the use will result in a reduction of quality of life due to increased traffic flow, late night noise and car parking problems.  

H&SS in their letter dated 18 July 2007 make recommendations with regard to general food hygiene, wash hand basins, extract ventilation and pot/ dish wash area. 

All consultations are attached with the background papers

 

 

Summary of Representations

9 letters of representations received and all were letters of objection. The nature of the objections were:

  • unacceptable impact on neighbours by virtue of noise and odour nuisances
  • unacceptable increase in traffic generation
  • unacceptable problems with parking and highway safety
  • increase in litter causing pests such as seagulls and vermin
  • no parking provision for commercial deliveries or home delivery drivers
  • increase in anti-social behaviour
  • insufficient waste facilities

 

The agent and applicant responded to the letters of representation and advise that

  • opening hours are proposed between 5pm to 11pm
  • a notice will be displayed inside the premises to discourage illegal parking
  • noise from the kitchen will be reduced by noise baffles within the extraction system proposed
  • odours will be reduced by carbon filters within the extraction system proposed
  • waste will be collected via a private refuse collector
  • a litter bin will be provided outside the premises

 

All letters of representation and responses are attached with the background papers

 

 

Planning Issues

Policy Considerations

Policy BE3 seeks to promote the vitality and viability of the town centre of St Helier by resisting the loss of ground floor retail uses and residential units, by supporting the conversion of under-utilised upper floors to residential, al fresco activities, pedestrian improvements and streetscape enhancements, and by reducing the adverse effects of traffic.  

Policy IC21 states that new take-away food outlets will normally only be permitted provided that the proposal

  • is within the St Helier town centre, local shopping centre or Tourist Destination Area,
  • will not unreasonably affect the character or amenity of the area,
  • will not have an unreasonable impact on neighbouring uses and the local environment by reason of noise, odour, pollution, visual intrusion or other amenity considerations,
  • will not have an unacceptable impact on registered buildings,
  • will not lead to unacceptable problems of traffic generation, safety or parking,
  • will have no unreasonable effect on the vitality or viability of St Helier town centre or local shopping centre, and
  • is in accordance with other policies of the Plan.

 

Land Use Implications

Hot food take-away shops can be a conflicting land use with residential. Potential impacts on residential neighbours can be a high turn-over of customers, unsociable hours, cooking odours and parking problems. Whilst the Island Plan promotes the vitality of the town centre a balance must be struck between highly active uses and residential in some areas. 

The character of the area is predominantly residential and, although it is within the St Helier town centre, the street is relatively quiet. There are two vehicle maintenance garages to the north-east of the site, however these operate during normal daytime working hours, and are not a source of late night noise or disturbance. At the present time, the only source in the area for late night noise is from the public house opposite the subject site to the south-west.   

In any case, the consideration must remain to the impact that the proposed change will have on the current situation and amenity of the area. The effect of a hot food take-away within a residential area can sometimes be mitigated through conditions and controls, but in this instance the condition and controls would be so strenuous that it questions the acceptability of the land use change. 

Size, Scale & Siting

The proposal makes no changes to the exterior of the building, except for extraction ducting, and all activity is contained on the ground floor.  The scale of the proposed use is relatively small being approximately 105m2 in area. 

Impact on Neighbours

The site is situated within a residential area and is completely surrounded by residential properties. As stated previously, hot food take-away shops can conflict with residential use by virtue of noise, odour, high customer turnover and parking problems.  

In terms of noise, the agent advises that noise baffles will be used in the extraction system. This may be acceptable in terms of the extraction system, however additional noise to the area will be produced by the use itself through the high customer turnover and the nature of the business. This noise cannot be controlled and thus the consideration is whether this level of activity and noise is acceptable within the area. Although the site is within the St Helier town centre, the immediate area is relatively quiet residential area with late night noise disturbance limited to the existing public bar. The introduction of a hot food take-away will be an additional source of late night noise and disturbance than that which is currently experienced in the area. Given the close proximity of residential properties and the predominance of residential uses in the area, it is considered that further late night uses are unacceptable.  

In terms of odour from the cooking fumes, this can be carefully controlled through carbon filters, grease filters and appropriate ducting. These can all be conditioned and controlled and thus odour is rarely an issue, however the proposed ducting discharges on the first floor flat roof in close proximity to residential windows on the first floor of the subject property and the neighbouring property. This can be resolved by requesting the ducting to discharger one metre above the roof of the property, however it is considered that the presence of a commercial flue above the ridge line of these residential properties will be noticeable from the public viewpoint and would detract from the residential character of the area.  

On-street parking has been raised by the local residents as a current issue in the area. There is limited on-street parking and the road is one-way. The introduction of a take-away shop will increase traffic generation to the area, if not significantly by customers, by commercial deliveries, refuse collectors and home delivery drivers. The proposal has no parking provision on-site and thus the introduction of a take-away shop will worsen the current parking issues for neighbouring residents.  

Access, Car parking and Highway Considerations

The proposal does not include any parking provision for staff, deliveries, operational requirements or customers. The proposal does involve a home delivery service but no parking provision or pick-up/ drop-off area has been proposed.  

The very nature of a hot food take-away results in a high turn-over of customers. The agent argues that the customers will be pedestrians and whilst this may the case for the majority of customers, it is unrealistic to presume that this will be the only customer base.  

The proposal does not provide any operational parking spaces for commercial deliveries or any parking spaces for home delivery drivers. There are two commercial delivery spaces outside the public bar for use during working hours but normal parking is permitted after hours. These spaces therefore cannot be used for home delivery drivers. On-street parking is limited to approximately 10 spaces within 50 metres radius. However these on-street spaces are used primarily by residents of the area and are rarely unused.  

Given the limited on-street parking spaces on both Columbus and Albert Street and total lack of any on-site provision, it is considered that a hot food take-away without any parking provision will result in parking problems and highway safety issues.    

Foul Sewage Disposal

The subject property is connected to foul sewer.  

Waste Disposal

There are no proposed waste disposal areas within the building and no public waste bins within the immediate area. The agent advises that waste is to be collected from a private refuse collector but there are no bin store facilities proposed within the building and no parking provision for the collection vehicles.  

Therefore the waste disposal methods proposed are considered unsatisfactory for the use proposed.

 

 

Officer

Recommendation

Refuse

 

 

Conditions/

Reasons

1. The proposal will unreasonably affect the character and amenity of the area contrary to Policy IC21 of the Island Plan 2002

2. The proposal, by virtue of noise and odour pollution, will unreasonably impact on neighbouring uses contrary to Policy IC21 of the Island Plan 2002.

3. The proposal will lead to unacceptable problems of traffic generation, safety and parking contrary to Policy IC21 of the Island Plan 2002.

 

 

Background Papers

1:2500 Location Plan

Photos of site

Parish response dated 10 August 2007 and 6 September 2007

H&SS response dated 18 July 2007

9 letters of representation

 
 

Endorsed by:

 

Date:

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button